HumanRank alpha

Classifica editoriale globale

MethodologyPrivacyTerms

HumanRank combina profili editoriali di persone pubbliche con coorti anonime della popolazione generale. Ogni posizione pubblica fonti, fiducia, incertezza e versione del modello.

General population stays anonymous by cohort. Public figures can have sourced editorial profiles.

Cohort estimate

Delhi

South Asia
EarthScore573
Global#3.211.947.059
Local cohort#2.941.384
Top 39.6%range 505-641, medium confidence (59%)
Prosperity29
Health52
Education57
Safety48
Environment27
Connectivity67
Opportunity55

Claim layer

Claim or correct a profile

When claimed, a private Firestore profile is stored with revocable consent. The person can add evidence, correct sources and dispute weights.

Claiming is blocked until a valid OAuth Web Client is configured in Google Auth Platform.

Global living ranking

Tutti nello stesso ranking

HumanRank stima posizioni dal #1 al totale delle persone viventi. I profili pubblici con fonti compaiono insieme alle coorti anonime finché ogni persona reclama o corregge il profilo.

8.120.000.000estimated living people
50.000indexable public profiles
DataLocal seeds
#139.843editorial

Serena Williams

tenista e inversora

Estados UnidosSports
EditorialScore90,5
confidence81%
range 77,5-100 | sources 8
unique slot
Perfil WTASerena Ventures
model: public-figure-editorial-v0.1.0
#903.241editorial

Elon Musk

emprendedor y ejecutivo

Estados UnidosBusiness
EditorialScore85,4
confidence76%
range 71,4-99,4 | sources 9
unique slot
Tesla leadershipPerfil Forbes
model: public-figure-editorial-v0.1.0
#3.211.947.059anonymous

Anonymous cohort

Delhi, age 30. Unnamed profile until claim.

IndiaSouth Asia
EditorialScore573
confidence59%
range 505-641 | sources 0
model: macro-capability-v0.2.0-demo
Net worth and wealth are handled as source-estimated ranges, not absolute facts.Sentiment is a capped, separate subcomponent; it never decides the ranking alone.Any ranked person can claim, correct, add evidence or dispute the profile.

SEO regionale

Classifiche per regione

Pagine editoriali localizzate per ricerche regionali e long-tail dentro un unico ranking globale.

America Latina

3 | 3 | EarthScore 681

Apri regione

Nord America

3 | 2 | EarthScore 843

Apri regione

Europa

3 | 3 | EarthScore 856

Apri regione

Medio Oriente

1 | 1 | EarthScore 853

Apri regione

Asia Pacifico

4 | 4 | EarthScore 887

Apri regione

Asia meridionale

2 | 1 | EarthScore 586

Apri regione

Asia orientale

1 | 1 | EarthScore 767

Apri regione

Africa

3 | 3 | EarthScore 574

Apri regione

Long tail globale

Pagine per paese e città

Landing localizzate per paese e città, sempre collegate al ranking globale.

Paesi

India2 | 1.430.000.000Cina1 | 1.410.000.000Stati Uniti2 | 342.000.000Nigeria1 | 229.000.000Brasile1 | 203.000.000Messico1 | 129.000.000Giappone1 | 124.000.000Germania1 | 84.000.000Francia1 | 68.000.000Regno Unito1 | 68.000.000Sudafrica1 | 61.000.000Kenya1 | 56.000.000Corea del Sud1 | 52.000.000Argentina1 | 46.200.000Canada1 | 41.000.000Australia1 | 27.000.000Emirati Arabi Uniti1 | 11.000.000Singapore1 | 6.000.000

Città

TokyoGiappone | #451.628.334DelhiIndia | #3.211.947.059ShanghaiCina | #988.576.598Sao PauloBrasile | #1.985.586.707Mexico CityMessico | #1.755.475.174MumbaiIndia | #2.832.842.763New YorkStati Uniti | #655.810.654LagosNigeria | #4.969.966.477

Model governance

Open weights and rationale

The ranking should not hide normative values. We publish the active weight, rationale and a vote for more, less or equal weight in the next version.

Verifiable achievementactive weight 26%

Awards, offices, records and public credentials with sources. Keeps fame or wealth from dominating alone.

Social impactactive weight 22%

Measures scale and depth of public contributions, with caps so visibility is not confused with benefit.

Public notabilityactive weight 18%

Uses coverage and encyclopedic presence as a verifiability signal, not as moral approval.

Public sentimentactive weight 12%

Stays capped because public mood is noisy, manipulable and culturally uneven.

Source qualityactive weight 10%

Raises confidence when sources are official, stable and multiple; penalizes less auditable profiles.

Wealth / economic reachactive weight 7%

Counts lightly and as an estimated range. The open question is how much society values economic capacity.

Reputation stabilityactive weight 5%

Does not reward ideological consensus; it only limits jumps when public evidence is unstable or disputed.

Age / future horizonnot active

Not active by default. It can be debated as a life-stage signal, with high risk of age bias.

GCP architecture

Ready to move from demo to platform

Cloud RunNext.js container
Firebase Authopt-in identity
Firestore + BigQueryprofile and datasets
Secret Managercredentials and keys
General population stays anonymous by cohort; public figures can have sourced editorial profiles.Gender is used for cohort labels, not score calculation.Verified personal data can be revoked and audited.Next: ingest public datasets into BigQuery and recompute cohorts on schedule.

Impartiality

Social proof as calibrated evidence

Credentials
Max weight 22%

Prefer issuer verification, expiration dates and domain relevance over brand prestige.

Work profiles
Max weight 18%

LinkedIn or portfolio data must be normalized by role, seniority, geography and opportunity access.

Peer praise
Max weight 12%

Endorsements are capped, domain-specific, duplicate-resistant and weighted by rater reliability.

Health activity
Max weight 16%

Activity signals need device provenance and disability-aware interpretation.

Civic impact
Max weight 14%

Donations, volunteering and open work are scored by verified impact, not dollar amount alone.

No follower count, likes or raw connection count in score.Praise needs a declared domain such as leadership, craft, reliability or mentorship.One rater cannot move a score materially; repeated reciprocal praise is discounted.Public figures and high-network users receive saturation caps.The model reports social-proof contribution separately from macro capability.Aggregate audits compare outcomes by geography, gender disclosure, age band and socioeconomic proxies.