HumanRank alpha

Peringkat editorial global

MethodologyPrivacyTerms

HumanRank menggabungkan profil editorial tokoh publik bersumber dengan kohort anonim untuk populasi umum. Setiap peringkat menampilkan sumber, keyakinan, ketidakpastian, dan versi model.

General population stays anonymous by cohort. Public figures can have sourced editorial profiles.

Cohort estimate

New York

North America
EarthScore824
Global#655.810.654
Local cohort#346.481
Top 8.1%range 753-895, medium confidence (57%)
Prosperity75
Health78
Education88
Safety67
Environment60
Connectivity93
Opportunity91

Claim layer

Claim or correct a profile

When claimed, a private Firestore profile is stored with revocable consent. The person can add evidence, correct sources and dispute weights.

Claiming is blocked until a valid OAuth Web Client is configured in Google Auth Platform.

Global living ranking

Semua orang dalam satu peringkat

HumanRank memperkirakan posisi dari #1 hingga seluruh populasi hidup. Profil publik bersumber muncul bersama kohort anonim sampai setiap orang mengklaim atau mengoreksi profilnya.

8.120.000.000estimated living people
50.000indexable public profiles
DataLocal seeds
#139.843editorial

Serena Williams

tenista e inversora

Estados UnidosSports
EditorialScore90,5
confidence81%
range 77,5-100 | sources 8
unique slot
Perfil WTASerena Ventures
model: public-figure-editorial-v0.1.0
#903.241editorial

Elon Musk

emprendedor y ejecutivo

Estados UnidosBusiness
EditorialScore85,4
confidence76%
range 71,4-99,4 | sources 9
unique slot
Tesla leadershipPerfil Forbes
model: public-figure-editorial-v0.1.0
#655.810.654anonymous

Anonymous cohort

New York, age 30. Unnamed profile until claim.

United StatesNorth America
EditorialScore824
confidence57%
range 753-895 | sources 0
model: macro-capability-v0.2.0-demo
Net worth and wealth are handled as source-estimated ranges, not absolute facts.Sentiment is a capped, separate subcomponent; it never decides the ranking alone.Any ranked person can claim, correct, add evidence or dispute the profile.

SEO regional

Peringkat per wilayah

Halaman editorial terlokalisasi untuk pencarian regional dan long-tail dalam satu peringkat global.

Amerika Latin

3 | 3 | EarthScore 681

Buka wilayah

Amerika Utara

3 | 2 | EarthScore 843

Buka wilayah

Eropa

3 | 3 | EarthScore 856

Buka wilayah

Timur Tengah

1 | 1 | EarthScore 853

Buka wilayah

Asia Pasifik

4 | 4 | EarthScore 887

Buka wilayah

Asia Selatan

2 | 1 | EarthScore 586

Buka wilayah

Asia Timur

1 | 1 | EarthScore 767

Buka wilayah

Afrika

3 | 3 | EarthScore 574

Buka wilayah

Long tail global

Halaman negara dan kota

Landing terlokalisasi untuk negara dan kota, terhubung ke satu peringkat global.

Negara

India2 | 1.430.000.000Tiongkok1 | 1.410.000.000Amerika Serikat2 | 342.000.000Nigeria1 | 229.000.000Brasil1 | 203.000.000Meksiko1 | 129.000.000Jepang1 | 124.000.000Jerman1 | 84.000.000Prancis1 | 68.000.000Inggris Raya1 | 68.000.000Afrika Selatan1 | 61.000.000Kenya1 | 56.000.000Korea Selatan1 | 52.000.000Argentina1 | 46.200.000Kanada1 | 41.000.000Australia1 | 27.000.000Uni Emirat Arab1 | 11.000.000Singapura1 | 6.000.000

Kota

TokyoJepang | #451.628.334DelhiIndia | #3.211.947.059ShanghaiTiongkok | #988.576.598Sao PauloBrasil | #1.985.586.707Mexico CityMeksiko | #1.755.475.174MumbaiIndia | #2.832.842.763New YorkAmerika Serikat | #655.810.654LagosNigeria | #4.969.966.477

Model governance

Open weights and rationale

The ranking should not hide normative values. We publish the active weight, rationale and a vote for more, less or equal weight in the next version.

Verifiable achievementactive weight 26%

Awards, offices, records and public credentials with sources. Keeps fame or wealth from dominating alone.

Social impactactive weight 22%

Measures scale and depth of public contributions, with caps so visibility is not confused with benefit.

Public notabilityactive weight 18%

Uses coverage and encyclopedic presence as a verifiability signal, not as moral approval.

Public sentimentactive weight 12%

Stays capped because public mood is noisy, manipulable and culturally uneven.

Source qualityactive weight 10%

Raises confidence when sources are official, stable and multiple; penalizes less auditable profiles.

Wealth / economic reachactive weight 7%

Counts lightly and as an estimated range. The open question is how much society values economic capacity.

Reputation stabilityactive weight 5%

Does not reward ideological consensus; it only limits jumps when public evidence is unstable or disputed.

Age / future horizonnot active

Not active by default. It can be debated as a life-stage signal, with high risk of age bias.

GCP architecture

Ready to move from demo to platform

Cloud RunNext.js container
Firebase Authopt-in identity
Firestore + BigQueryprofile and datasets
Secret Managercredentials and keys
General population stays anonymous by cohort; public figures can have sourced editorial profiles.Gender is used for cohort labels, not score calculation.Verified personal data can be revoked and audited.Next: ingest public datasets into BigQuery and recompute cohorts on schedule.

Impartiality

Social proof as calibrated evidence

Credentials
Max weight 22%

Prefer issuer verification, expiration dates and domain relevance over brand prestige.

Work profiles
Max weight 18%

LinkedIn or portfolio data must be normalized by role, seniority, geography and opportunity access.

Peer praise
Max weight 12%

Endorsements are capped, domain-specific, duplicate-resistant and weighted by rater reliability.

Health activity
Max weight 16%

Activity signals need device provenance and disability-aware interpretation.

Civic impact
Max weight 14%

Donations, volunteering and open work are scored by verified impact, not dollar amount alone.

No follower count, likes or raw connection count in score.Praise needs a declared domain such as leadership, craft, reliability or mentorship.One rater cannot move a score materially; repeated reciprocal praise is discounted.Public figures and high-network users receive saturation caps.The model reports social-proof contribution separately from macro capability.Aggregate audits compare outcomes by geography, gender disclosure, age band and socioeconomic proxies.